Author Archives: ABOVE Quota

Crystal Ball Sales Recruiting – Or, How Sales Leaders Pretend To Be Ms. Stephanie.

After a pleasant lunch with one of my brothers I walked to my car and found this flyer stuck in my windshield wiper. I had to laugh.

IMG_2201

That morning I was chatting with a Sales VP. He had just taken over the reins and was doing his due diligence on a number of issues including recruitment. What he described was a typical lack of rigor in their approach to selecting sales talent. He described some “uga buga”, crystal ball, astrology like practices that were in place.

Here are just a few of the things he told me.

1. We tend to hire jocks. The CEO was a college football player and big golfer. He thinks athletes are naturally competitive and therefore the best suited for sales. Gender didn’t matter but they did seem to have a 90-10 mix of men vs. women.

2. They poach from their competitors. The industry is incestuous. Everyone knows everyone else and people bounce from one firm to the next. The promise is that they will bring their book of business with them.

3. The sales managers agreed that they knew a good rep when they saw one. When interviewing they felt they could spot a winner within minutes.

4. They felt they needed to sell the candidates on joining the firm. After all, applicants were taking a big risk coming over to our side. We need to tell them what a great place this is and the kind of money and career opportunities that exist.

5. There were no standards or metrics around recruitment. When an opening occurred the manager dialed 1-800- HR Recruiting and started looking for the best talent.

Of course these SOP’s were yielding predictable results in terms of high turnover, slow ramp time to productivity and stagnant new business growth.

Lets look at each one of these common ailments and see if we can counter them.

1. We tend to hire jocks…… This one is so arcane it hardly warrants an answer. Most sales forces I’ve worked in or with had women at the top of the stack rankings. Moreover, there are a lot of women buyers today in most industries and they notice when your sales force isn’t diverse. http://www.strategicsearches.com/2015/04/24/women-advantage-sales-industry/

2. They poach from their competitors.  Problem is very little of that business switches. At best they bring a big deal they were working on. Its is also hard to teach an old dog new tricks. Better to hire fresh thinkers from outside your business as opposed to inherit a bunch of bad habits. 

3. The sales managers knew a good rep when they saw one. They should quit their jobs as sales managers and make a fortune in recruiting. The odds on interviewing alone as a predictor of success are on average a coin toss. Sales Managers don’t interview enough to be masterful at it. Most are rusty, don’t prepare and ask questions that telegraph the response they are seeking. Manager : “Tell me how you prospect?” Candidate: Hmmmm, prospecting must be important I can make up a good story here. 

4. They felt they needed to sell the candidates on joining the firm.  This means they spend 80% of the interview talking versus asking questions and listening. Probably similar to half the sales calls their sales force makes. There is a time and place for everything. To me it’s a half buy – half sell conversation. Yes, at some point you are selling but you don’t want to over sell. 

5. There were no standards or metrics around recruitment.  Although they had no metrics to examine, because they had no replacement planning discipline the number of lost territory sales months was very high and costly. Territories or seats in the sales desk remained open of weeks or months. Worse the pressure to fill often lead to snap decisions to hire because they were desparate. 

Maybe Ms. Stephanie could be engaged on a part time basis and add another “worst practice” to their talent management process? On the other hand they could hire my sister Suzanne White the High Priestess of Chinese Astrology to help.

For help in assessing your sale force’s talent and strengthening your Talent Management practices contact me at JHoskins@salesgenomix.com or 480.235.5582

The Hiring Manager’s Guide to Breaking Bad.

bad-apples1Hiring managers in any functional area will feel the pain from making a bad hiring decision. This story from a close colleague and partner is telling. It is about a conversation he had with a SVP of Engineering for an un-named huge global aerospace company. During his final presentation pursuing a six-figure assessment services contract he made this point about the process and service he was recommending. “Our firm will help you hire the best engineers in the country”. The SVP abruptly stopped his pitch and interjected. “Look” he said, “there are not enough great engineers out there to fill my demand for talent”. He continued, “What I want you to do is help me not hire any bad engineers. We simply cannot afford that mistake.”

While hiring a bad engineer might get you a plane that crashed, hiring a bad sales rep has it’s own acute pain and long-lasting side effects. Last month, I observed a workshop on Behavioral Interviewing. The participants were a seasoned, and I might add, talented group of frontline sales leaders (over 300 years of cumulative expertise in a room of 20). To warm them up and set the context for the day, the facilitator asked them to work individually to think of a time when they made a poor hiring decision. As far as I know, no one in the group said, “I’ve never made a bad hire”. They were then asked to share their thoughts with the group and describe the costs or business impact, of that hire.

In spite of the fact that they considered this question on their own, the output of the dialog yielded some very similar observations. Here are some of the more interesting comments from participants.

Poor Hires

  • They split the team.
  • Cost me at least 2 more months of recruiting and interviews.
  • The money wasted on training, introductions to customers, only to repeat the process after we let them go.
  • It affected the team dynamics
  • Really a poor reflection of our company and me across the board
  • We invested more in investigations and legal fees than we did to hire them.
  • Team and customer disruption, loss of team energy
  • I had to spend way too much time fixing the problem
  • Had to work through HR documentation process
  • I spent less time with other team members
  • I took a chance, wanted to give someone an opportunity and the learning cycle was too long
  • My manager wanted me to hire this person and I caved
  • Total time drain to train, coach, monitor
  • Customer complaints caused me/others to make “fix it” calls
  • I lost credibility with the team
  • Even the hire suffered with time from his family and a negative experience on his resume
  • Internal hire trying to move from inside marketing to sales – too risky
  • Customers didn’t want to see her
  • Wasted time and training resources including my time, my managers and HR
  • My team was watching – how will this set some kind of precedent?
  • The employee was dissatisfied with their performance as much as I was
  • Impact on the team and my workload
  • Adding additional unplanned for recruiting time/costs
  • It was a bad experience for our customers too.
  • Energy drain on the team and me
  • Slowed the learning at team meetings trying to bring this person along
  • Customers were unable to understand our value and products.
  • The rep became very frustrated and upset too
  • It actually put some of our customers in a safety risk
  • Unproductive and stressful on the team, me, my manager and our customer
  • We lost opportunities in the market spending time correcting this problem and that meant we lost revenue during a product launch.
  • Always a drain on the team, constantly trying to pull others down to their level
  • Customers wouldn’t meet with her – other team members had to cover for her
  • It was a major time commitment on my part

Many other comments were not captured, however the themes were consistent. They could be summarized in several “impact and cost” buckets.

  1. Team morale/credibility
  2. Time drain for manager, managers manager, and HR
  3. Customers were poorly served – loss of goodwill
  4. Company and managers reputation and brand were tarnished
  5. Recruiting costs increased
  6. Sales opportunities were lost
  7. Legal and severance costs increased
  8. The person themselves felt like a failure. Career damaging

We then asked flipped the question to ask them to consider the characteristics of one of their organization’s best hires. Again, working on their own and then sharing answers with the group. Once more this exercise produced very similar responses.

Great Hires

  • The person was trusted
  • They were very solutions oriented not problem identifier
  • They were direct and open
  • Strong work ethic
  • Strategic thinker
  • Customer focused
  • Passionate about the product and helping customers
  • Peer leader
  • Fun to be around/upbeat enthusiastic but not blind to reality
  • Balanced family and work
  • Proactive to seek opportunities
  • Resourceful
  • Quick study
  • Positive impact on the team
  • Excited and passionate
  • Ethical
  • Offered something to the team
  • Missionary not mercenary
  • Liked challenge
  • Did more than expected without being asked
  • Always raised the bar
  • Eager to learn
  • Tops in technical knowledge
  • Got the job done and had fun doing it
  • Attitude was contagious – people liked being around him
  • Blended in with culture and team
  • Was supported and embraced by other stakeholders inside
  • Concern for customer and customers customer
  • Asked for help and never gave up
  • Self-aware
  • Shared best practices with others for the good of the team
  • Humble but proud
  • Passion for what we do
  • Quantifiable approach to business

Like the first question, there were many other comments not captured; yet the themes are consistent. These characteristics, summarized in similar categories to those listed above are nearly polar opposites.

  1. Contributed to the Team morale/credibility
  2. Did not drain time for manager, manager’s manager, or HR – took initiative and enjoyed challenge.
  3. Passionate about the Customers and eagerly served them to build goodwill
  4. Company and managers reputation and brand were enhanced by the persons presence not diminished
  5. Recruiting costs decreased
  6. Sales opportunities were captured not lost
  7. Legal and severance costs were avoided
  8. The person themselves added value to the team, customers and the organization.

When making a decision to hire a new sales rep you can’t be overly deliberate or you might lose the opportunity to hire great talent. However, your process and due diligence must go beyond gut feel and “winging it” as the consequences are too ominous.

At SalesGenomix we encourage clients to use the 30-30-30-10 decision-making model.

30-30-30-10 Hiring Model

In sales the common maxim is that customers make decisions based on feelings and emotions and justify their decision with facts and logic. We wouldn’t really disagree with that. Hiring is also a buying decision. However, we like to see some weighting given to the decision criteria to prevent unforced hiring errors. Try this out on your next hire.

  1. Skills – 30 percent of your decision should validate the selling skills that the person possesses. Are those the skills that you know lead to success in the unique type of selling you do? Can they do what you need them to do? I often discuss turnover with line managers and they have a refrain. Well we hired John for who he was, everyone really liked him. But, I had to fire him for what he couldn’t do. That means he lacked the fundamental sales skills to succeed.
  2. Motivations – 30 percent of the decision should weigh the individual’s motivations and how they are driven to approach tasks, relationships and influencing others. What drives that person to do their work? Will they do what you need them to do in the job you are trying to fill? This is a tricky area but I have had less skilled people with strong motivations make quota. On the contrary, I have seen highly skilled reps with little or no strong motivation that fell short of expectations.
  3. Values – 30 percent your conclusion about the candidate is whether they fit your culture – are they aligned with your core values and the cadence of your organization’s process? Do they share a passion for the company or team vision and will they be a net add to the team. Are they a fit for your culture? This is an important part of your organization’s value proposition to talented players. The well-known shoe and apparel company Zappos (now an Amazon company) had to hire 250 customer care reps in Las Vegas. It’s was an $11 an hour job. Their culture was so highly regarded they received 25,000 applicants to fill the slots.
  4. Gut Feel – 10 percent. The problem is trying to quantify a gut feeling? Interviews are an unnatural meeting environment. Especially when a motivated buyer (the sales manager) is meeting with a motivated seller (the candidate). Over the years there are some good questions to ask yourself whenever making this chemistry check decision. It’s difficult to not see this as a trump card even though its 10%. Try these out on your next hiring decision. Credit goes to the many sales leaders I know who taught me these key checkpoints.

    Are you excited about hiring this person?
    Do you feel a sense of excitement and energy that makes you eager to bring them into the team? If you are not excited now, you never will be.Is this someone you would invite over to your home for dinner? This one sounds a bit corny, but if you don’t want to introduce them to your family doesn’t that tell you something?

    Would you buy from this person? If this individual called on you to sell you anything, a car, a house, maybe even your own product would you see yourself buying from them?

    Do you see this person with the company 5 years from now? A job hopper is a job hopper. A manager of mine at Xerox used to say that any applicant with more than 3 sales jobs in 5 years was a knock out. The exception was upwardly mobile reps in the same company who went from inside sales to a territory and then to major accounts or sales management.

    Do they have a trail of Blue Ribbons? This is tantamount to reading the racing form. The same Xerox manager wanted everything from top seller of Girl Scout cookies to 5 years in a row as a member of President’s Club. Winners tend to win over and over. You need to look for accomplishments where they excel at what they do over time.

In summary, avoiding costly hiring mistakes requires a consistent approach to your selection process. Consider the many possible tools you can employ to source, screen, assess and select a new hire. The more rigor and discipline you can put into the process the more likely you will have the desired outcome and the greater the probability that you will make your quota, attend this years incentive trip and of course, cash that bonus check at the end of the year. Good Hiring!

P.S. One last piece of advice. If you happen to make that bad hiring decision, cut your losses early. I would warrant that most of us know we made a mistake with a few weeks maybe even a few days. If you suspect that you were somehow fooled and there are early warning signs and symptoms that you goofed don’t hang on for hope. Certainly you have to follow whatever HR guidelines you are accountable to, but don’t let your decision to fire linger hoping things will get better. Trust your instincts they are likely right. Clients tell me the worst managers are quick to hire and slow to fire.

Tagged

Sometimes You Get Lucky…no, not that kind of lucky!

IMG_0985

Sometimes you get lucky. I play Words With Friends™ with just one person. One opponent is all I have time for and it keeps the mind clicking at my advanced age. When Julie beats me (routinely) she says – “Oh, I just got lucky”.

Thinking about it, if you ask others after they succeed at anything – a tennis championship, landing a big account, selling a business – they often include the word “luck or lucky” in their answer.

It was Gary Player, the famous South African golfer who coined the expression; “The harder I practice, the luckier I get”. But, when was the last time a hiring manager practiced interviewing?

Hiring isn’t about lucky and often selection of a new hire is left to chance due to poor selection process and interview practices. Managers get rusty and tend to depend a little too much on luck and gut feel when more interviewing. This lack of preparation usually means the candidate has practiced interviewing more often than the interviewer has.

I spend my time in the sales recruiting world and there you typically find a motivated buyer (the sales manager) who has an open territory with no prospects for making their quota and/or this years bonus with a vacancy. He or she is talking to a motivated seller (the sales pro) who needs a job to pay for the BMW and knows how to persuade. Likely they have role-played their answers to the unprepared interviewers canned list of questions. Sell me this pencil. Or, what are your greatest weaknesses? Pull-ease!

Imagine if all hiring managers would pretend every one of their direct reports was leaving tomorrow?  What’s wrong with bench strength in your applicant data-base? I love it when recruiters say – “We are not advertising now we filled that position.” Really? Are you paid to fill positions or are you paid to build a talent pipeline? If you practice behavioral interviewing at least once a week you get razor-sharp skills and a keen awareness of best practices. Pun intended! Try it you’ll like it and you’ll get luckier.

Practice makes perfect, but like common sense, it’s not all that common!

 

 

Tagged

Innovation

On a recent business trip to Seattle I bought Inc. magazine and enjoyed several of the articles in this June’s issue. One that struck me most was about a disruptive entry into the hotel space. Rattan Chadha has looked at the hotel experience from top to bottom and designed a refreshing approach I can not wait to try out.

.Image

As a road warrior for decades, every aspect of Chadha’s thinking made total sense to me. The CitizenM experience described makes me wonder how this same type of innovative thinking might be applied to hiring sales professionals. What is the experience like for the applicant and the hiring manager? How could the process be streamlined made more efficient and effective?

We believe that a candidate needs to take the initiative to pre-qualify their skills. Set themselves apart from the herd of applicants with more than just another resume full of bio data. Research suggests the average recruiter spends less than 10 seconds looking at a resume. While our eHarmony of sales recruiting career site is just one step in the right direction this article motivates me to look for other ways to rethink the current state and find even better ways.

Here is a link to the article. See if you don’t agree he has nailed what the seasoned traveler is looking for in a hotel. Also take any process you have in your business and ask yourself what could we do to innovate a more user friendly high value low cost experience. http://www.inc.com/magazine201406/liz-welch/citizenm-low-cost-high-end-hotels.html

Tagged , , , , ,

How to Turn Around Your Sales Force Not Transform It!

A New, 120-Day Action Plan To Accelerate Sales Results

Image

In June of 2012, Sales Benchmark Index published research that found the average tenure of a Vice President of Sales is 19 months. They claim no other member of the executive suite fails as often as the newly appointed Chief Sales Officer. Conversely, VPs of Sales whose mature teams have lost their drive and energy for growth are under fire to recharge, replace and redirect their teams – or find another job.

This white paper presents 3 keys for heads of sales to accelerate performance and achieve sustainable sales results. The authors give a new perspective on fundamental principles of leading and managing for sustained growth – having the right people in the right positions, having an accurate and reliable sales pipeline system, and having processes to manage and measure activities. 

The authors simplify the task not to minimize its difficulty, but rather to give senior sales executives focus and clarity for the challenge. They suggest that a solution is found not in costly, lengthy transformation efforts; rather, through a simple dedicated approach that is proven to accelerate results.

Image01 People – 

“Making shots counts, but not as much as the people who make them.” 

Mike “Coach K” Krzyzewski, Duke Men’s Basketball legend 

Start with your people. 

According to a study of World Class Sales organizations conducted by Chally Group Worldwide, 39% of a customer’s decision to buy from your company is based not on product, quality, price or even service – it is based on the sales representative. Therefore you will want to answer these questions first: 

1. Do I have the right people on the team for the sales challenge we face today? 

2. How quickly can I find new sales talent that fits the desired model? 

The sooner you take inventory of your sales team’s talents including your sales management the faster you can leverage their strengths, promote them, or move them out. And, the faster you can start to meet revenue quotas. 

But how do you know if the talent you have is the talent you need? Determining what a good sales rep looks like and the competencies that make them successful is critical. One simple and well-known paradigm is the classic farmer-hunter model. If you need talent that has a greater propensity to open new accounts, then a team of farmers will slowly lead you to ruin. On the other hand, if you need sales talent that is more skilled at maintaining and growing existing relationships then a team of pure sales hunters could lead to disaster. 

Before undertaking this task consider the 3 most common and often fatal mistakes that some executives make in undertaking this work. 

1. Seeking the answer to the wrong question. 

What do my top performers do that makes them successful? 

It’s a classic error to pose this question. A common exercise that some VPs of Sales do is to seek the input of subject matter experts to build a list of competencies for the sales positions and then rewrite the job description. While this seems useful it is a potentially flawed approach because of its subjectivity. The subject matter experts are often dominated by the loudest voice in the room but not necessarily the most accurate voice. As a result, it leads to many false positives because in every sales force the top and bottom sales reps look very similar. They actually share 90+ percent of the same skills and abilities. This is why the poor performers got hired. They slipped through the hiring process because the hiring manager thought they saw a top performer. 

This is a better question to ask: What are my top performers able to do that my bottom performers cannot? 

You are not looking to build a laundry list of competencies; rather, you want to discover the few critical success factors that the top performers possess that the lower performing reps do not. Once you have those 5-8 factors identified you can then validate them more scientifically. 

2. Allowing the process to be totally subjective. 

A second mistake that VPs of Sales make is to allow for too much subjectivity in what they do next after the competencies are identified: determining how well current sales staff ranks against the competencies you need, and mapping the skills needed for each position. 

Think of the task at hand to understand how unreasonable it is to expect that anyone (VP of Sales) could use subjective gut feel or “experience” to drive the evaluations: each sales position is unique in its competencies and skill sets required to excel. Each salesperson needs to be evaluated as a fit to the competencies. Someone who is a strong fit to a “hunter” type position can easily be confused with someone who is a weak fit. Resumes and track records can be misleading. 

Using a scientific approach to the process lets VPs of Sales quickly make “fact based” decisions versus gut feel, legacy politics or traditional top grading approaches. The right people can be promoted and the poor performing ones redeployed. While some approaches such as those that focus on personality traits can be revealing it’s important to select an assessment that is validated, EEOC compliant, and measures skills. 

Once you know how each salesperson matches to the competencies you can prescribe the right training, coaching and development to improve the skills that are mapped to your new competencies. This saves time and makes you more productive. 

The same approach should be taken for the management team. They are the lynch pin to the strategy since they play a prominent role in assessing and coaching salespeople daily. 

Finally, the system that is created for assessing the current team can also be used to recruit and develop new talent. Candidates for sales positions can be screened for having the same 5-8 competencies identified as critical to success on the job. 

3. Giving up ownership of the process to the Human Resources department. 

As the VP of Sales the responsibility of hitting quota is 100% yours. Therefore giving HR the responsibility for leading the sales talent process is the equivalent of a coach being responsible for winning the big game and being told she can’t be on the floor calling the plays with her team. 

We don’t mean to disparage HR – in fact, just the opposite. HR can play a very important role in finding, assessing and keeping sales talent. You have to own the process and help HR see the role they should play. 

Forming a partnership between HR and Sales can be a win-win if you include HR at your planning table. By engaging their resources and talents towards mutual goals you have an extra set of hands to support you and your managers as you create new expectations and hold people accountable to them. Provide HR insights to your challenges and agree to metrics that you will track and share together in routine progress reviews. Have them share in the results regarding turnover, recruiting, compensation benchmarks, and on-boarding and advanced training. 

By engaging with HR upfront they’ll be in a better position to support your needs for new talent as you turn the ship in the right direction and have to redeploy some team members. Performance Improvement Plans have legal implications and you and your frontline sales managers want HR’s informed experience to be side by side with you in the process of reinventing the team. Don’t feel like you need to be the lone ranger they are as aware as anyone that getting sales back on the growth curve is job number one. 

Ask them to support you in all stages of the talent audit you undertake in people phase of this turnaround strategy. They can co-facilitate meetings, manage vendors, run interference with legal issues, teach your managers better interviewing practices, source new ideas to compensate and incent new business, and help with the analysis and interpretation of the results of your work. Finally they can be side by side with you with execution support when you start to implement your plans versus caught by surprise when dealing with fallout from the change process. 

With your “People” strategy in motion it’s time to put attention to the next major element – your sales pipeline. 

Image02 Sales Pipeline 

“A good forecaster is not smarter than everyone else, he merely has his ignorance better organized. “ 

Anonymous 

It might be wise to start with people but the sales pipeline needs quick attention next. 

The sales pipeline plays a critical role in getting faster and sustainable sales results for several reasons: 

• It’s a strong indicator of the health of the company’s business 

• It’s drives sales growth 

• It’s tied directly to achieving quota 

• It feeds the sales forecast 

• It can reveal weaknesses and strengths of salespeople, which is beneficial to coaching and to assessing salesperson competency 

Step 1: Find out how real the sales pipeline is. 

The first task is to evaluate the health of the company’s sales pipeline. Without a healthy pipeline hitting quota is in jeopardy and sales productivity can plummet. 

The problem faced by most VPs of sales is they cannot trust the pipeline to be real. This severely handicaps decision-making, coaching, forecasting, and time (priority) management. 

The fastest way to evaluate how real the pipeline is requires you to engage in an exercise of learning how much of it reached TVR, or Total Viable Revenue. TVR is the part of the pipeline where the customer for each deal has committed to spending money on new products or services if necessary, or committing to making a change in current suppliers. They’re beyond “thinking about it”. Their problem is now a priority with a committed timeframe for fixing it. 

TVR is a good measure of pipeline health because these are sales that some company will most certainly win – but not necessarily your company. 

 

Step 3: Provide pipeline training and coaching. 

When new processes are established even if they are incremental to existing ones it is smart to provide training and coaching. 

Training is an excellent way to introduce new concepts to the process and to reinforce expectations of use. Coaching is needed to keep salespeople in compliance and effectively using the process. 

The most pivotal person to train however is the sales manager. The success or failure of the process is largely within their control at least with their own salespeople. If they let salespeople opt out then the process will be limited in impact. If they are strong leaders of the process then it will produce desired results. 

Some salespeople and their managers believe that training and coaching in the pipeline is unnecessary because it is such a fundamental and simple concept to understand. They might say you fill the pipeline, work the deals, and always make sure there is enough in it. While this is true it is like saying to drive a car is simple. Put the car in drive, press the accelerator, and steer. Many car accidents do not happen because the driver doesn’t know “how to drive a car”’. They happen because the driver failed to operate the car properly. 

Similarly, pipeline management doesn’t fail because people don’t get filling it, working the deals, and having enough in it. It fails because of operator error. The point of pipeline inspections (Funnel Audits) is to reduce or eliminate operator error. 

Finally, there’s one more step that helps VPs of sales accelerate performance and sustain it. It’s about process. 

Image03 Process 

“A manager is a title, it does not guarantee success. Coaching is an action, not a title and actions will result in successes!” 

Catherine Pulsifer 

Having the right salespeople on the team and in the right positions leads to success. Having an accurate, healthy sales pipeline positions the entire sales organization to win more sales and achieve company revenue goals. Having processes to lead people and the pipeline completes the picture of success. 

The last step and the one where true field execution begins is sales management cadence. The word “cadence” is often associated with marching bands or military squadrons where everyone is aligned toward the same destination. IBM applied it to its operating system or “sales cadence” used by IBM sales leaders to manage their sales organization. 

In many parts of an organization you can see cadence in action. Accounting has its GAAP, Manufacturing has SPC, Six Sigma or LEAN, and IT has operating systems. All of them share a common theme: processes by which they align people, manage activities, and measure output to achieve results. The same concepts of process and alignment apply to sales. 

Deals that have not yet reached TVR are important. They become the next TVR. They deserve to get selling attention. But because they have yet to reach TVR they should not count toward pipeline value. 

Here’s a TVR exercise that could be described as a sort of “spring cleaning”. Sales managers should meet with their salespeople and determine which pipeline deals have reached the TVR stage. Deals where the rep can say with 100% confidence the opportunity has reached TVR. Those get included in pipeline value. Deals that do not are not counted. They stay on the pipeline however. 

Beware of salespeople incorrectly claiming that TVR has been reached because of reasons such as “they love us”, “we have a good relationship with them”, “they’re not looking at anyone else”, and others. If reps cannot provide tangible evidence that the company has committed to spend money to fix the problem don’t count it as TVR. 

This exercise puts non-TVR deals where they belong and can purge the pipeline of some of the outdated, inaccurate deals. However, without a process for keeping the pipeline clean it will eventually get cluttered and inaccurate again. That leads us to step 2. 

Step 2: Establish and enhance the pipeline management process. 

As quickly as possible the VP of Sales should establish or enhance the company’s sales pipeline process. This is important for both short-term results and long-term results. However, there is perhaps no business process either more commonly left alone for individuals to manage or gets the wrong kind of attention than the sales pipeline. As a result, many sales pipelines are either neglected or mismanaged. 

There could be several components to a pipeline process but two are critical. One is building the sales pipeline (or funnel) around customer buying stages. Each stage is defined by a milestone that the customer reaches as steps in their journey to making a purchase. This gives salespeople the best chance for building quality and accuracy into their pipelines, one deal at a time. 

There is a major caution to be noted. Simply defining customer buying stages will not magically lead salespeople to place deals at the right stage nor do they automatically transform a salesperson’s selling behavior. In other words, despite having stages defined correctly, pipelines will often still have bad data on them. 

The second critical process component is committing to monthly pipeline inspections (also known as Funnel Audits). The Audits are structured conversations between each sales manager and his or her reps. They help the rep maintain the high levels of quality for what he or she reports on the pipeline. 

With these two critical elements to the pipeline process the VP of Sales has a way to view the pipeline data that brings a lot of value to himself, his sales managers and their salespeople, and to other senior executives like the CFO and CEO for months and years to come. 

Given the impact of the sales pipeline process to many stakeholders in the company no assumptions should be made about individual sales people, their managers or others knowing what they need to know to accurately use the process. Therefore step 3 is about training and coaching to the new process. 

Step 3: Provide pipeline training and coaching. 

When new processes are established even if they are incremental to existing ones it is smart to provide training and coaching. 

Training is an excellent way to introduce new concepts to the process and to reinforce expectations of use. Coaching is needed to keep salespeople in compliance and effectively using the process. 

The most pivotal person to train however is the sales manager. The success or failure of the process is largely within their control at least with their own salespeople. If they let salespeople opt out then the process will be limited in impact. If they are strong leaders of the process then it will produce desired results. 

Some salespeople and their managers believe that training and coaching in the pipeline is unnecessary because it is such a fundamental and simple concept to understand. They might say you fill the pipeline, work the deals, and always make sure there is enough in it. While this is true it is like saying to drive a car is simple. Put the car in drive, press the accelerator, and steer. Many car accidents do not happen because the driver doesn’t know “how to drive a car”’. They happen because the driver failed to operate the car properly. 

Similarly, pipeline management doesn’t fail because people don’t get filling it, working the deals, and having enough in it. It fails because of operator error. The point of pipeline inspections (Funnel Audits) is to reduce or eliminate operator error. 

Finally, there’s one more step that helps VPs of sales accelerate performance and sustain it. It’s about process. 

03 Process 

“A manager is a title, it does not guarantee success. Coaching is an action, not a title and actions will result in successes!” 

Catherine Pulsifer 

Having the right salespeople on the team and in the right positions leads to success. Having an accurate, healthy sales pipeline positions the entire sales organization to win more sales and achieve company revenue goals. Having processes to lead people and the pipeline completes the picture of success. 

The last step and the one where true field execution begins is sales management cadence. The word “cadence” is often associated with marching bands or military squadrons where everyone is aligned toward the same destination. IBM applied it to its operating system or “sales cadence” used by IBM sales leaders to manage their sales organization. 

In many parts of an organization you can see cadence in action. Accounting has its GAAP, Manufacturing has SPC, Six Sigma or LEAN, and IT has operating systems. All of them share a common theme: processes by which they align people, manage activities, and measure output to achieve results. The same concepts of process and alignment apply to sales. 

A sales operating system is a process by which a sales leader and their team monitor certain activities, with a routine frequency, using standard metrics to measure results and tools to manage the process. These activities may include but are not limited to; sales planning, recruiting, field coaching, forecasting, and performance reviews. In turnarounds, we suggest the focus is on just two areas. The previous section described pipeline management in monthly pipeline audits and we would add one more process. Place a focus on coaching in the field not from behind a desk. 

The most often stated and least measured sales management performance standard is the amount of time a frontline sales manager spends in the field riding on calls, pre-call planning, observing the call, and post call debriefing. The norm is 50% as a goal. Some companies set the bar as high as 80%. That is 4 days out of 5 in the field traveling with reps meeting customers. In running many coaching workshops one of the authors notes that a common reply to the question of how much time are sales managers in the field is a range from 15-20%. 

Here is a simple step to put this process in place and you will see dramatic results in just 90 days. 

1. Set a standard with each sales manager for the next 90 days. 50% (2.5 days a week in the field) No excuses. 

2. Have them present a plan to you for each rep they manage as to how many days they will spend with that rep and what the focus of their time spent will be from a coaching point of view. 

3. Explain the sales process you want followed and decide how you want them to report their results each month of the previous months field activity. 

4. Train the managers to plan calls, observe them and how to conduct a post call debriefing. 

5. Set a benchmark from their pipeline for each rep as to track the following: 

– Number of active prospects on the forecast 

– How many are new prospects, how many are repeat customers 

– The gross potential value of the sales forecasted 

– The 90-180-Full Year Forecast for each territory 

Field coaching is the crucible for learning what is going on in the business. Getting managers on joint calls is the best elixir for any sales ailment. In fact, if you had just one thing you could do to turn around sales in the next 120 days that is where we would suggest you focus. 

Conclusion

People, Pipeline and Process that is your mantra for 120 days. Focusing on a few things versus the many makes this plan work. Again, sighting findings from the Sales Benchmark Index research. SBI suggests there is a tendency toward what they call “thrashing”. Implementing the wrong sales improvement programs launched due to improperly diagnosed problems, resulting in lots of activities but few results. Our viewpoint? We agree wholeheartedly, less is more. 

If you want to learn more about how to assess your sales team, improve your pipeline health and forecast accuracy, or install a field coaching discipline write to us of give us a call. 

About the Authors 

“Using the stats the way we read them, we’ll find value in players that no one else can see. People are overlooked for a variety of biased reasons and perceived flaws. Age, appearance, personality.”

Peter Brand, Moneyball 

Mark Sellers, is CEO of Breakthrough Sales Performance, a sales training, coaching and consulting company. He is the author of the book The Funnel Principle, named by Selling Power magazine a Top Ten Best Book to Read. Mark is a leading authority on sales pipeline performance. 

Mark can be reached at 614.571.8267 and mark@breakthrough-sales.com 

John Hoskins, Co-Founder and CSO of SalesGenomix, has a background and specialization in sales consulting. SalesGenomix has been called the eHarmony of sales recruiting. We connect pre-assessed sales professionals with sales leaders and the jobs that match their unique sales DNA. 

John can be reached at 480.235.5582 and jhoskins@salesgenomix.com The sales talent discovery system. 

Sales Candidates, Its Your Interview Too – Plan and Pre Qualify Before The Call

While we all know the value of planning for a sales call, the same holds true for a job interview.

Image

As a business owner, one of the things I get to experience is other sales people calling on me. It always amazes me how ill prepared some of them are. Why is it when I ask – Well, Frank have you visited my website? So many say no! Some even have the gall to say…I’m pulling it up right now. Really? Thats all the forethought you have put into calling me? Asking me for my time? My business? You cannot be serious. No sale.

In interviews its the same. There is simply no excuse for not preparing yourself in advance with the myriad of tools available to research the company, their results, news about them, their competitors, and the LinkedIn profile, Facebook and Twitter accounts of the person you are interviewing with. The list is limitless. Don’t leave to chance the meeting structure. If you are applying for a sales job consider the interview a sales call. Pre-call plan and prepare your opening just as you would in your territory. After the pleasantries like the weather etc get to the point.

I used to offer my sales reps this simple “call opener” formula that works well. B.O.A.T. – B=background (let me explain how we came to have this call and what I have done to prepare for our meeting) O = objectives (my objective today in meeting with you is X and Y) A = alternative objectives (what did you want to , together today to make this the best use of your time?) T = time (I was told we would have about 30 minutes today – is that still appropriate?)

One could argue – thats a bit stiff or formal. Others would say be careful not to take over the interview and I agree. Yet experience tells me when delivered with the appropriate amount of body language and genuine intent people really appreciate your being prepared. Finally, giving sales candidates assessments is common. What is uncommon is for a candidate to hand over an assessment they’ve already taken. If you’re interviewing for a specific sales role, hand the hiring manager proof (like this http://goo.gl/rZFKHO) that you’re wired for success in that position. Certify yourself and your skills for them. Think other candidates do that? See how it helped this guy land a dream sales job. goo.gl/QVkAgb

Want to learn more click here: https://www.salesgenomix.com/signup-129/ If you can’t afford to pay for this just get in touch and we will figure something out. You can get a great sales job and then pay us! And if you are a veteran – its on us. Call me.

Tagged , , ,

Whats The Next Killer App Job Board?

Whats The Next Killer App Job Board?

The International Association of Employment Websites (IAEW) now boasts over 1200 members in a universe of more than 40,000 job boards at last count.

In 1999, Monster.com’s super bowl ads launched the explosion of the online job posting space and wrestled the help wanted business away from print newspapers. Since then many boards launched to compete in an industry that flourished. However, the landscape changed so quickly with external market forces popping up so fast it disrupted the growth of what was once Wall Street’s darling. Monster’s stock price declined by nearly 90 percent from over $40 a share in April of 2007 to just over $4.00 a share in October of 2013. Continue…http://www.recruiter.com/i/the-anatomy-of-a-job-board-whats-next/

Tagged , , , , , , , , ,

Selecting To Build A World Class Salesforce

Where we explore hiring managers and recruiters who lack understanding of the myriad of tools and resources that can be utilized to increase their odds of making a good hire. More importantly how to reduce the odds of making costly, unforced hiring mistakes. 

It continues to surprise me that so many of our prospects continue to rely solely on their interviewing skills to make important sales hiring decisions. It’s old news that it’s bad odds to do so, yet it is the predominant practice which prevails. Even multiple interviews by others is often the same interview several times.

Trusting the result of a structured interview to make your final decision on a sales candidate is at best about a 50/50 bet. Some interviewers even brag about an uncanny ability to pick winners, but in a quiet moment they’ll admit they’ve made mistakes too. Oddly, even though they claim they use structured behavioral interviewing methods, if you observe them interviewing they are so rusty , they pretty much talk their way through the whole process. Or, here is another favorite….Sell me this pen! Pullleease! That question is so old there are tutorials on the web to teach candidates how to formulate a great answer for it. Unstructured interviews have been sighted by some authorities as worse than no interview at all.

I often wonder if you put real money – the hard cash – that they were about to spend on the table in front of them – lets say conservatively $75,000,00 for  a new sales rep hire – not including the intangible costs and lost opportunity costs. And then said – “Ok, if you just use just your interviewing skills method – there is about a 50/50 chance you will lose this money.” How many would ask if there was anything else they could do to improve the odds?

Having spent years in the sales training and development space I’ve witnessed many sales management training curricula that include Behavioral Interviewing Skills. However, precious few have anything else about predictive assessment tools, background checks, reference checking. At best they may reference that is should be done – but there isn’t any true understanding of the “how to” or discussion of the value of such methods in improving the chances of hiring the right person.

Until sales recruiters and hiring managers begin to embrace better tools and methods to manage the risks of bad hires – the unforced hiring error will survive. Even in today’s sluggish economy where you would think its a buyers market mistakes are made. Rushing to judgement, hiring in ones own image, racing against the “time to hire” metric, the absence of a quality bench of candidates, and the dependence on the “one note song” and somewhat arcane interview practices feeds the tiger that is costly to nourish and time consuming to get rid of once brought into the zoo!

Tagged